Oxford said it would “decolonize” computing courses because of its alleged connection to machine learning.
The university’s computer science department has devised ways to show students “how global histories of domination and subjugation impact the structures of science they see and the principles they encounter.”
He says he is committed to “understanding what it means to take off the course and explore the precepts that have been taken for granted for decades, if not centuries.”
The faculty, one of the oldest computer science institutes in the UK, says there is a “growing awareness” that “new technologies can have a detrimental effect on individuals, communities and whole societies”.
But the department, which is headed by Prof Leslie Ann Goldberg, has come under fire for making itself “colonized” by critical American theories of race.
“It is necessary to overcome these effects of understanding that it is often rooted in the colonial past that it has tried to impose even on its most benign standards and understandings in other Western countries, and in keeping the local population at its worst and degraded, creating divisions and hierarchies of value that are replicated in vast datasets so often in used machine learning,” said faculty leaders.
It follows last week that the body of universities in the standards of degrees is now warning that the field is high to go “awakened”, bringing down the most subject areas.
The Quality Assurance Agency’s new policy says accounting courses must address “how colonial divisions and hierarchies of value are replicated and reinforced” in the subject. while mathematics courses “present a multicultural and discolored view”.
Oxford’s computer science department declared that “being non-racist is insufficient” because the university “benefited from and perpetuated feelings and practices rooted in deeply hurtful prejudices and prejudices.”
He then states that “carrying out research that is truly representative” requires an anti-racist position”, including decolonization and “rejection of the conscious and unconscious past of evil”.
The new capacity modules include one in companies, the other in ethics and responsible innovation.
The move comes as British universities increasingly shift their focus on the evils of the British Empire from humanities courses to maths, science and engineering degrees – despite critics saying the curriculum has nothing to do with it.
The department added that “computer science itself has been characterized as a colonial system, exporting technology to particular cultural and social contexts in other regions of the world, without regard to local needs or contexts.”
Therefore, he says, “there will continue to be a need for digital innovation, digital, and digital data to explore how databases and images can support indigenous knowledge systems.”
Toby Young, head of the Freelancer Union, told The Telegraph: “With the takeover of Oxford’s computer science section, the British colonial university’s burden on America’s industrial complex has ended.
“After that, it doesn’t matter what subject you study at university, whether it’s computer science or English – you’ll be taught about critical theory.”
Among the research projects established by the Oxford department is a model “ethics hackathon” to help students develop equity and responsibility in the engineering of tools and systems.
A University of Oxford spokesman said: “All faculties regularly review and update their courses to reflect the latest developments in the field, and recent initiatives have broadened the topics we teach and research.”
“Most science courses include content covering ethical and social issues surrounding their subjects. Such content is often formally required by employing bodies, such as engineering institutions.”